I am offended by the antics of Chicago’s Department of Cultural Affairs.
Even their own survey shows (pg 27): Artists throughout the city expressed a negative perception of the Chicago Public Art Program, the City’s major instrument for visual art commissions and special artist projects. Artists feel that the Program is inaccessible and little effort is made to provide information about upcoming projects, awarded commissions, important deadlines, selection criteria, committee members, or whether their own submissions had been received.
Well, it gets a lot worse.
Less than 10 days ago, at the request of Commissioner Of Cultural Affairs, Lois Weisberg, Mayor Daley introduced an ordinance to modify the Municipal Code regarding the Percent for Art Program. He obviously did it as a favor to Ms, Weisberg and probably didn’t even read it.
Yesterday the ordinance passed the Committee on Special Event and Cultural Affairs, rubber stamped. So now it moves on to the City Council, where there too it will pass. And we are screwed. This ordinance was on the fast track - passed in committee on the last day the lame duck aldermen are in government, the last day this committee will ever meet - new committee assignments get made this coming week.
These modifications are horrendous. They constitute the privatization of government and propel the Department of Cultural Affairs’ (DCA) overbearingly selfish attitude into a righteous ability to ignore artists and what is good for the community and act in their own self-interest with no oversight or recourse from anyone.
Here’s the deal. At the hearing yesterday Lois Weisberg spoke about streamlining their procedures and acting with the best interests of artists and community in mind. But what was written in the ordinance is a disconnect with the sentiments she and a small parade of artists gave lip-service to.
The ordinance does away with
Advisory Panels (they used to have voting rights)
The Public Art Committees (they too had voting rights)
The need to have Open Meetings
The need to take minutes of any kind
The new ordinance says that DCA will have discussions with the alderman in whose ward art will be placed, BUT there is absolutely no ability for the alderman or anyone else to have a say in what DCA decides to do. There will be NO VOTE. There will be NO MINUTES. There will be NO REPORT.
See SunTimes article.
Yesterday, when I testified I suggested there was the appearance of bad faith because nowhere on the DCA website or the Chicago Artist Resource website could I find a listing of upcoming commissions.
When I mentioned this to the DCA Curator of Special Projects before the meeting he said “do you know how long it would take to go through those applications?” Does the fact that they might get better art matter one iota, or that they would be sharing information? Tons of artists do not register because they do not believe DCA cares. Well, if a Chicago artist saw a possible commission that spoke to their specific aesthetic they just might apply.
After I testified, the Public Art Program director told me I was wrong, that it is on the website. So last night I spent 60 minutes looking at the DCA website and the CAR website and I came up empty handed.
Not that it will improve the bad attitude Lois Weisberg’s Department of Cultural Affairs perpetuates, but I offer a $100 challenge: Be the first to show me where information about possible commissions is on either website and how one navigates to it from the front page of the website and I will send you a crisp $100 bill. *** (and I will post the information here - if you don’t see it, it didn’t happen.)
The Department of Cultural Affairs needs a shakeup. They do not act in the public interest and have just proved that they don’t care what you and I think.
*** Here’s what a public art commission should look like (this, or this or this) - and not like a fishing expedition to get people to sign up for the database. If I were commissioner of public art, you’d know what was being looked for in content, in size/scale and how much was available for funding.