artletter home         artletters out         links         artletter info       mccormick material

Art Letter (8/3/09)

Maybe Iím humoring myself. I feel like some of the bellyaching and cheerleading some of us have undertaken on behalf of Chicago art and artists is making a difference.  Maybe itís the economy. Maybe itís pragmatism. For a while now Iíve been seeing more Chicago art in Chicago galleries. Additionally, thereís a firestorm of new galleries popping up all over town. Healthy.



And now, Iíve just had the joyous pleasure of seeing the passionately and compassionately considered installation of
Constellations at the Museum of Contemporary Art, brilliantly curated by the insightful and tireless Julie Rodrigues Widholm. I donít think it had an opening, but it's a significant exhibition one rather harsh critic and friend of mine described as a ďwatershed moment.Ē



In Constellations a splendid number of accomplished Chicago artists have been blended into a powerful show that includes Chicagoans
AbercrombieSiglerOtero, Klement, Marshall, Kimler, Krane-Bergman, Ledgerwood, and Grabner along with fabulous works by artists from Magritte to Reinhardt.  (The artists are listed in the order I encountered them and the order in which the images are reproduced.  Did anyone notice that 2/3 of those gifted and deserving artists are women?)



Iím impressed with this exhibit. Itís wearing very well.  Itís a different kind of test than the Ďmerelyí visual / visceral one that takes place when immersed in the show.  (You can equate this to movies if you want.) This has to do with the Ďmeatí of the show - the stuff that sticks.



What weíre seeing here is theoretically major. (Theoretical because it could just be an accident.  Iíve not heard or read about any intent.) What sticks is that Chicago art holds its own against art of globally acknowledged stature. And by all means, donít take my word for it. This you should experience yourself.



All right. So this elevates the whole game to a higher plane. (Argh, the thought does occur to me that Iím way out on a limb here and that they didnít even know these artists were from Chicago or they had a hole to fill (twice) and the Chicagoanísí pieces were the right size.) Here were have a museum adding a whole new voice to an international discussion - The Local Voice.



Is this true?  Is this the opening salvo in the War to End Cookie-Cutter Museums?  At first, when I wrote about the
Modern Wing, my gut reaction was that it was good that it had the quotidian art of the common world-class art museum. That way, I knew we belonged.  But slowly, that made my stomach turn.



Letís make a leap of faith here. Letís assume that Iím right. The Museum of Contemporary Art, in a world shattering move, has bridged the huge gap between international cookie-cutter sameness and local, informed, Ďprovincial.í but good, homegrown art. 



I find this an intelligent move on the part of the MCA, expanding from the awareness that local art Ďworksí alongside global art to the realization that the dialog is enriched by the addition of The Local Voice to the International Chorus, be it harmoniously or as a counterpoint.



I think this is fabulous.  Iím tired of how similar all contemporary and modern American museums are. Add the local voice to each  . . . and every museum becomes special.

Brilliant! Youíve got to see the show!
 
Thank you.
Paul Klein