home   letters out   letters in   links   info

home           letters out           letters in           reviews           links           info

Art Letter Review #4

Photo Respiration: Tokihiro Sato Photographs
Through May 8th at the Art Institute of Chicago

Dan Jacobson
April 5, 2005

At first glance this exhibit of former sculptor Tokihiro Sato’s photography appears to be a relatively generic display of contemporary black and white photography. Of course the images where large and the transparencies were cleanly displayed with backlighting. The show is nicely spaced but would have benefited from better or lower lighting levels. I never read the accompanying documentation before viewing artwork, and I hadn’t seen Sato’s work before.  I viewed the exhibit with the mindset that at least I would see images from places I have never visited and be exposed to an artist whose work I hadn’t seen.

Sato’s photographs suffer from an ailment that seems to permeate contemporary art. The work struggles unsuccessfully to find a balance between subject and process. The process ends up being more interesting than the resulting artwork. I wouldn’t normally endorse the idea that the viewer needs to be familiar with the artist’s process in order to understand the artwork but in the case of these photographs it is essential. Without that knowledge these photographs seem generic and derivative. Sato’s black & white compositions, with their glowing spots and lines of light, could have been created with any number of digital imaging software. Knowing the meticulous planning and rigorous process that Sato engages in helps the work tremendously.

Sato’s photographs are created utilizing an aspect of photography that existed at the time of its invention. Extremely long exposure time means that objects that are moving during the length of the exposure, and move out of the frame, do not appear in the photograph. Or, if the object remains within the picture frame, appear as blurred forms. This process causes the repetitiveness of waves crashing against the rocks to appear as mist. It also turns a crowded, busy urban intersection into a strangely abandoned landscape. Through this technique, Sato’s work contains a strong link between contemporary photography and its past.
More importantly, though, Sato uses the long exposure technique to place emphasis on a much more interesting aspect of his work. The long exposure times, 1-3 hours, allows the artist to move through, and in and out of, the picture frame without recording his physical presence. I say physical presence because the artist’s presence is recorded through the use of light reflected back to the camera as he moves. To accomplish this he uses a small mirror for daytime exposures and a small flashlight, which he custom built, for night shots. His photographs would be typical urbanscapes or landscapes if not for the groupings of bright spots or the lines of light tracking his movement during exposure.

While this process makes the work more dynamic, the real benefit comes from the questions it raises. These photographs are no longer a record of just a moment in time. Sato has actually recorded the passage of time in a single frame. Is this a photograph of a subject or a record of a performance? His three-dimensional activity is recorded in 2 dimensions. Does what’s missing become more interesting or important than that what is there? Is Sato a photographer, sculptor, or performer?

The presence of the artist in an artwork has always intrigued me, especially in contemporary art. Where is the artist standing? What is the intent? In non-performative work this is obviously more difficult to answer. It gets even harder as the trend for contemporary artists to further remove themselves from the work continues. But Sato has turned the notion of the artist’s presence on its head. He has been able to physically record his presence without recording his physical self. There are other works that are able to do this but, in a strange way, Sato is able to emphasize both his absence and his presence at the same time.

In the end, though, the photographs still feel repetitive and derivative. They either contain spots of light for daytime exposures or luminous lines for night shots. And, while I wasn’t greatly impressed by this group of photographs, I still came away from exhibit with a lot to think about.
In researching Sato’s work, I found works from this series that were more interesting and have stronger compositional qualities. I’m assuming those works were either unavailable or were sacrificed for the exhibit’s or curator’s aesthetic. The works included in the show are all from 1988-2001 which leaves me to wonder if Sato has been able to push the boundaries of this work further and if the compositional quality has changed. Hopefully these questions will get answered with a future exhibit.


NOTE: I  viewed this exhibit, and others, during the Art Institute’s free Tuesday. The catalogue, which contains an interview with Sato, is only $10. The point being that it is still very possible to have a great art experience at little or no cost in this city. Also, Sato will give a lecture at the Art Institute of Chicago on April 14th at 6:00 PM.